Monday, 3 November 2014

Wait, So Why Was Amanda Bynes Released From a Psychiatric Hold Right After It Was Extended? Here's How She Got Out Early & What's Next

OK, so Amanda Bynes was out and about last night in West Hollywood, just days after a judge extended her stay in a psychiatric hospital for another 30 days.

She was spotted Thursday shopping at the Beverly Center and eating at Mel's Diner on Sunset Boulevard. A source tells E! News that later she showed up at the London hotel--where she had stayed before without incident--plunked a wad of cash down at the reception desk and politely asked for a room, but was told she couldn't stay. As Bynes left, she turned around and said it was "bad karma" for them and they had hurt her feelings. (A rep for the London had no comment on the alleged incident.)

This morning she tweeted that she was on her way to court Friday afternoon to "fight my mother and father over control of my personal life and control of my finances." A couple of hours later she was writing things that were reminiscent of her social-media tear of yesteryear, such as, "People need to hear the truth about who I really am - I need to show the judge that not only do I not need ANY help making decisions about My future, I was planning on transferring to NYU, and I was never homeless, I was living in the nicest hotels until I found the right apt in NY" and "My Dad Is UGLY FOOLS."

So what's the deal?

Bynes, 28, remains under a temporary conservatorship that was reinstated on Monday, giving her mom Lynn Bynes control once again over her finances and medical decisions pending a hearing set for Feb. 24, 2015. And since a judge ruled also ruled at the time that it was the right thing to keep her hospitalized, why the quick about-face?

Mina Sirkin, an estate, probate and trust attorney in Los Angeles who's an expert regarding conservatorships, tells E! News that, after a hold is extended for 30 days (Bynes was initially admitted Oct. 10 on a 72-hour hold that was subsequently extended for 14 days), the patient "has a right to stay why she should not be in an involuntary hold."

"She has the right to have her own expert psychiatrist testify as to why she should not be held against her wishes," Sirkin, who is not involved with Bynes' case, continued. "Mary Shea [Bynes' court-appointed attorney] is a very capable public defender. "She will hire the top psychiatrist to show that Amanda is not so impaired to need to be in a secured facility. She will display her as merely eccentric."

So, even though the hold was technically extended, Bynes had the right to argue her case and was released right not long after her two-week hold was supposed to expire.

"Under mental health rules, a person cannot be involuntarily held without a court order beyond the days the statute allows," Sirkin explained. "First, 72 hours, then 14 days, and then 30 days. At the 30th day, a hearing has to be set to keep her longer under the LPS [Conservatorship] rules."

"At the hearing, a psychiatrist has to testify as to why she remains gravely disabled, meaning that she is of either danger to herself or to others," Sirkin continued. "The conservatorship does not necessarily require hospitalization. Her mental state is what is in question [regarding] whether or not she needs to be in a secured facility against her wishes.  What a Conservatorship over a person means: what a person can and cannot be forced to do. It appears they can't be forced to stay in an institution.

"Conservatorship of the person allows for the conservator to make medical decisions for her, but a locked-facility or secure-facility order require special circumstances of grave disability."

So between now and February...

"She will be out, unless she has another episode which requires her to go in under another 72-hour hold, called a 5150 hold," Sirkin said. "The spending issues are related only to the conservator of the estate and cannot affect the decision to release her."

Meanwhile, Bynes did not show up in court this afternoon, though her parents, Rick and Lynn, did with their attorney, as did a lawyer whom the judge ultimately refused

No comments:

Post a Comment